Until both of these questions, (**) and (***), are appropriately answered, then you
have no hope of understanding what is the set, A, that is being defined by statement, (*). |
|
Until you know exactly which set, "B",is being talked about in statement, (*), you won't
be able to know what is this set, A, that is being defined by this statement, (*). |
|
Until you know exactly which property, "P", is being talked about in statement, (*), you won't be able to
know what is this set, A, that is being defined by this statement, (*). |
|
Once you know exactly which set, "B", is being talked about in statement, (*), and which property, "P", is
being talked about in statement, (*), then you know exactly which set, A, is being defined by this statement, (*). After all, this is precisely
what statement (*) tells you in such a "meaningful" context (i.e. in such a context where statement (*) has a meaning). Namely, it tells you,
in such a context, precisely which set, A, is being defined by it. |
|
In such a "meaningful" context, statement (*) tells you which objects in the "universe" are in the set, A. Namely, those objects
which are not only elements of the given set, B, but also satisfy the given property, P. |
|
In such a "meaningful" context, statement (*) tells you which objects in the "universe" are not in the set A.
Namely, those objects which are either not in the given set, B, or, which, although they are in the given set, B, they do not satisfy the given
property, P. |
|
In such a "meaningful" context, statement (*) gives you precise knowledge of the set, A. It tells you "what's in" and "what's out" of the set A. |
|